Iran - Trump's broken deal - manoeuvre to war?

By Peter Koenig. Dated: 5/13/2018 1:10:23 PM

"What is it then that Trump and his handlers expect from this illegal decision of rescinding an international agreement? - A move towards "Regime Change"? - Hardly. They must know that with this undiplomatic decision, they are driving President Rouhani into the camp of the hardliners, this large fraction of Iranians who from the very beginning were against this Deal in the first place."
Trump's "Broken Deal", his irrational decision to withdraw from the JCPOA, or simply called Iran's Nuclear Deal, has hardly any other motives than again launching a provocation for war. The decision goes against all reason. Let's not forget, that deal took 9 years of diplomatic efforts, a negotiation called "5 + 1" for the UN Security Council Members, plus Germany - and, of course, Iran. It was finally signed in Vienna on 14 July 2015.
A quick background: From the very beginning, way into Trump's Presidential Campaign, he was against the deal. It was a bad deal, "the worst Obama could have made" - he always repeated himself, without ever saying what was bad about it, nor did he reveal who was the "bad-deal whisperer", who for once didn't get across to Obama with his unreasonable requests.
My guess is, Trump didn't know, and he still doesn't know, what was / is bad about the deal. Any deal that denuclearizes a country, is a deal for Peace, therefore a good deal, lest you forget the profit motive for war. The reasons Trump recently gave, when announcing stepping out of the Nuclear Agreement - Iran could not be trusted, Iran was a terrorist nation supporting Al-Qaeda and other terror groups, Iran's ballistic missile system - and-and-and… were ludicrous, they were lies, contradictory and had nothing to do with the substance of the Deal - which frankly and sadly, Trump to this day probably doesn't quite grasp in its full and long-range amplitude.
But what he does understand are his very close ties to Israel, or better to his buddy Bibi Netanyahu. And this not least, thanks to Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law, who has long-standing business connections to Israel and is also close to Netanyahu. Even the mainstream media are not blind to this fact. But this is merely an added weight in Trump's bias towards Israel, as the deep dark state that calls the shots on US Foreign Policy, is composed by the likes of Netanyahu. Survival, political or otherwise, Trump knows, depends on how well you follow their orders.
But back to reality: First, the Atomic Commission in Vienna has confirmed up to the last minute that Iran has no intention to start a nuclear arms program. They have confirmed their attestation 8 times since the signing of the deal. Second, the European allies - speak vassals - have so far strongly expressed their disagreement with Trump's decision, especially the three "M's" - May, Merkel and Macron. Their less noble reasons for doing so, may have to do with economic interests, as they have already signed billions worth of trade and technology-exchange contracts with Iran. Thirdly, even the more moderate and diplomatic Foreign Minister of the European Union, Ms. Federica Mogherini, said in no unclear tones - that there was no justification to abandon the Deal, and that the EU will stick to it. However, given past history, the EU has rather demonstrated having no backbone. - Have they now suddenly decided - for business reasons - that they will grow a backbone? - Would be nice, but so far, it's merely a dream.
Of course, Russia and China, will stick to the Deal. After all, an international agreement is an international agreement. The only rogue country of this globe, and self-nominated exceptional nation, feels like doing otherwise. Literally, at every turn of a corner, if they so please. And like in this case, it doesn't even make sense for the United States to withdraw. To the contrary. In theory, Iran could now immediately start their nuclear program and in a couple of years or sooner, they would be ready and equipped with nuclear arms.
But Iran is a smart and civilized nation. They have signed the Non-Proliferation pact and, at least for now, Iran's President Hassan Rouhani, has already pledged to stick to it. That could of course change, depending on how the Europeans will behave in the future. Will they eventually cave in to US pressure, or will they finally claim back their sovereignty and become an independent autonomous European Unit, able and willing to enter business relations with whomever they want and with whomever they deem is right, irrespective of illegal US sanctions. That would mean, of course, Iran, and normalizing relations with Russia, their natural partner for hundreds of years before the ascent of the exceptional nation. - Time will tell, whether this is a mere pipedream, or what.
What is it then that Trump and his handlers expect from this illegal decision of rescinding an international agreement? - A move towards "Regime Change"? - Hardly. They must know that with this undiplomatic decision, they are driving President Rouhani into the camp of the hardliners, this large fraction of Iranians who from the very beginning were against this Deal in the first place.
This decision is also a blow to the Atlantists or the "Fifth Column" which is quite strong in Iran. They see themselves abandoned by the west, as it is clear now, that Iran will accelerate the course they have already started, a move towards the East, becoming a member of the Eurasian Economic Union and formalizing their special status vis-à-vis the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), by becoming a regular member. Both are headed by Russia and China.
And, not to forget either, how does this "Broken Deal" affect negotiations between President Trump and DPRK's President Kim Jong-un on 11 June in Singapore? - Will anything that Trump negotiates and signs have any credibility?
Plus, not to forget, President Xi Jinping was crystal clear when he recently said that Iran will be a crucial and vital link within the New Silk Road, or the BRI - Belt and Road Initiative, a Chinese socio-economic and cultural enterprise that will likely dominate the next few hundred years with trillions of investments in transport, industrial manufacturing, education, research and cultural infrastructure, connecting Asia from the very east with western Europe, Africa, the Middle East and even South America. The BRI is also being included in the Chinese Constitution.
There is a good reason why this gigantic Chinese Program is hardly mentioned in the western mainstream media. - The corporate oligarchs who control these media don't want the world to know that the western fraudulent economy, built on debt and a pyramid monetary system (a large Ponzi scheme) is gradually declining, leaving all those that cling to it eventually abandoned and in misery.
Well, as in Chinese peaceful Tao tradition, President Xi is offering the world's nations, to join this great socio-economic initiative - no pressure - just an offer. Many have already accepted, including Iran, India, Turkey, Greece … and pressure from business and politicians in Europe to become part of this tremendous project is mounting. The BRI is an unstoppable train.
What good will US-western sanctions do to an Iran detached from the west? And ever more detached from the western economy and monetary system? - None. As Mr. Rouhani said, Iran will hurt for a short while, but then "we will have recovered for good". It's only by hanging between east and west - a line that President Rouhani attempted to pursue, that western sanctions have any meaning. From that point of view, one can easily say, Trump shot himself in the foot.
But there is the other branch of the deep state - the military-security industrial complex - the multitrillion-dollar war machine - an apparatus which feeds largely on itself: It produces to destroy and needs to destroy ever more to guarantee its survival. That would explain how Obama inherited two wars and ended his Presidency with seven wars - which he passed on to Trump, who does his best to keep them going. But that's not enough, he needs new ones to feed the bottomless war monster - which has become just about synonymous with the US economy, i.e. without war, the economy collapses.
Wars also make Wall Street live. War, like the housing market, is debt-financed. Except, war-funding is a national debt that will never be paid back - hence, the Ponzi scheme. New money, new debt, generated from hot air refinances old debt and will accumulated to debt never to be paid back. In 2008, what the General Accounting Office (GAO) calls "unmet obligations", or "unfunded liabilities", projected debt over the next five years, amounted to about US$ 48 trillion, or about 3.2 times GDP. In April 2018, GDP stood at about US$ 22 trillion as compared to unfunded liabilities of about US$ 140 trillion, nearly 6.5 times GDP. Ponzi would turn in his grave with a huge smile.
Since Washington's foreign policy is written by Zionist thinktanks, it follows logic that more wars are needed. A big candidate is Iran. But why? Iran does no harm to anybody, the same as Syria - no harm to anybody, nor did Iraq, or Libya for that matter.Yet, there is a distinct group of people who wants these countries destroyed. It's the tiny little tail that wags the monster dog - for the resources and for greater Israel - as unofficial maps already indicate - stretching from Euphrates across the Red Sea all the way to the Nile and absorbing in between parts of Syria, Iraq, all of Palestine, of course, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt.
(source: globalsecurity.org)
Those who control the US thinktanks make sure that this target is enshrined in the minds of US decision makers. It would count as a major achievement in the course of global hegemony by the Chosen People (not to confound with the 'exceptional nation'). Although, Iran is not within this picture, Iran would be the most serious and formidable opponent - enemy - of such a scheme.
By breaking the Nuclear Deal, Trump and his masters, especially Netanyahu, may have assumed a harsh reaction, now or later, by Iran. Or in the absence of such a reaction, launch a false flag - say a rocket lands in Israel, they claim it comes from Iran - and bingo, the brainwashed western populace buys it, and there is a reason to go to direct confrontation between Israel and Iran - of course, backed by Washington. This would make for war number 8, since Obama took over in early 2009. And it could account for a lot of killing and destruction - and most probably would involve also Russia and China - and - would that stay simply as a conventional war within the confines of the Middle East? - Or would it spread around the globe as a nuclear WWIII? - Would the commanding elite want to risk their own lives? You never know. Life in bunkers is not as nice as in luxury villas and on luxury boats. They know that.
That's the dilemma most of those who stand behind the Trump decision probably haven't quite thought through. Granted, it is difficult to think straight and especially think a bit ahead, when blinded by greed and instant profit - as the western neo-liberal/neo-fascist doctrine dictates.
My hunch is, don't hold me to it though, that this Trump decision, to "Break the Deal", is the beginning of a disastrous and yet, ever accelerating decline of the western Global Hegemony Project. -
—(Countercurents)
Peter Koenig is an economist and geopolitical analyst. He is also a water resources and environmental specialist. He worked for over 30 years with the World Bank and the World Health Organizationaround the world in the fields of environment and water.

 

Video

Indian History... Read More
 

FACEBOOK

 

Daily horoscope

 

Weather